Learning Space Redesign: It Doesn’t Have to Break Your Budget

A few weeks ago I walked into a Starbucks that was down the street from a high school. It was late in the afternoon and school had been dismissed for the day. The place was packed with high school students who were doing their homework; the students had migrated en masse from their classrooms to Starbucks. The students were sipping iced lattes and cappuccinos, and their textbooks, laptops, and papers were spread across the tables as they talked about their assignments, checked their social media streams. and watched YouTube videos on their smart phones. This was a typical Gen Z scene: students working in a relaxed setting while plugging into their devices. 

And it’s the direction our schools are moving as they create new types of learning spaces. Research is showing Gen Z brains are developing differently - which means Gen Z students learn differently. They’ve grown up in a Starbucks world of choices, apps, comfortable furniture, and fun surroundings. Thus, learning spaces today are evolving, too. A redesigned classroom today might look more like the inside of a Starbucks than a traditional classroom with straight rows and beige paint. Think of it this way: in the 20th century, classrooms were designed for teachers to disseminate information; in the 21st century classrooms are being designed for students to create and collaborate. 

As an ICLE professional learning consultant, I advise administrators on how to increase rigor, relevance, engagement, and technology usage, but I also discuss a myriad of other 21st century best practices, including learning space redesign. Administrators get it. They want their schools to evolve with Gen Z, but a question I often get from them is, “How much does it cost to create these new types of learning spaces?” 

I answer, “It doesn’t have to be expensive.”

Here are some key points to consider when determining costs. First, learning space redesign falls into one of two categories: creating a learning space in a new building or redesigning a learning space in a building that already exists. When architects design new schools today, they will be aware of the education trend of using space creatively when teaching Gen Z and will work some of these elements into the design process. The architects will ask school leaders how they want the learning spaces to function. What should be added to meet the space requirements and match Gen Z learning styles? Will there be soft chairs and couches, desks designed to fit together to foster collaboration, high-top tables and stools, carpet squares, and bright paint? The good news is the cost of new types of student furniture is often in line with the costs of traditional furniture, which is usually already budgeted into the cost of the new building. This means school leaders who have the good fortune of designing a new building should not dismiss adding new types of furniture or learning spaces because they will be prohibitively expensive. Sometimes they are even cheaper than traditional furniture. 

Of course, most school leaders don’t have the luxury of designing a new building, so they are focused on redesigning their existing learning spaces, sometimes in schools that might be forty, fifty, or sixty years old (or even older). These spaces can be wonderfully redesigned for Gen Z.  

Another point to remember about redesigning today’s schools is learning happens in all kinds of spaces, not just classrooms. Today’s students need to spread out as they collaborate and create, so administrators are searching for ways to add flexible common spaces where students can be comfortable and work with students from multiple classes. The school library has traditionally been the center of learning, and today’s media specialists are often leading the way as they refit their media centers for 21st century learning. School leaders are also redesigning hallways, cafeterias, foyers, and out of the way nooks where flexible seating can be added and used for various independent and collaborative learning activities. 

Existing learning spaces can be effectively redesigned on a relatively small budget. A tip I often give administrators is to make an overall, multi-year plan - and start small. The old saying is that Rome wasn’t built in day, and I remind principals that a school’s learning spaces don’t have to be completely revamped in one year. I urge educators to start with a few classrooms, a hallway, or a highly used common space to see what works so that students and teachers can get used to the idea. Or, if that’s too much I often say this: Start with one classroom and expand from there. 

For example, I visited a fifth-grade classroom recently, and the students were working on an assignment in which they used the app Book Creator to write books online. It was a great assignment and the students were engaged and enjoying the process. The students talked, showed each other their work, and delved deeply into their content. The teacher had encouraged them to work comfortably, which meant half of the students chose to sit at desks - while the other students sat in small clusters on the floor around the edges of the classroom. However, the learning space had not yet been redesigned, so the students on the floor were sitting on cold, hard tiles. This environment could have been easily upgraded with a few carpet squares, a couple of bean bag chairs, and a soft chair or two, which would have allowed the students to get off of the tile and be more comfortable as they learned. I spoke with the teacher and principal afterwards and said these touches could be added for around 500 dollars. 

As principals form their budgets for the coming school year, they can often find five hundred dollars for one classroom redesign or maybe two or three thousand dollars to start the process in a few classrooms and common spaces. I’ve also worked with principals who were able to get grants from their PTO’s and donations from local businesses. Some teachers have even redesigned their classrooms by using GoFundMe.com and DonorsChoose.org. I know a great high school teacher who scoured garage sales to find furniture for her classroom (but beware of any local health and fire codes that might prohibit the use of second-hand furniture in schools). 

Here's another tip when forming a redesign budget: when buying furniture, it’s often best to use vendors who specialize in school furniture. As district-approved vendors, the companies often provide deep discounts, and their furniture is designed to withstand the daily wear and tear of schools. Plus, they have specialists who can help you choose the right pieces. A few dollars might be saved by buying furniture at the local office discount store, but that furniture often won’t hold up and will have to be replaced more quickly. 

Finally, don’t forget to put aside funding to train teachers to use the new learning spaces. A book study can be an effective vehicle for fostering discussion, and digital tools such as PadletDotstorming, and Slack are strong online platforms where teachers can share ideas 24/7 - and like the rest of the space redesign process, they’re very affordable!

For more into about space redesign, read our book. Available at Corwin Press and Amazon.

For more into about space redesign, read our book. Available at Corwin Press and Amazon.

Moving Out of Future Shock

Toffler.jpg

Educators today often talk about changes and how they seem to be coming at a faster rate. It's hard to take it all in. When people ask me to explain the disruptions reshaping our schools today, I refer to the ideas of Alvin Toffler. 

In 1970, Toffler became famous with the publication of his best-selling book, Future Shock, which he said is “the shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short of a time.” He predicted the world was about to enter an amazing new age in which we would see massive societal and economic transformations, a rapid acceleration in change, and life would begin to move “faster and faster — in everything from technology to family structure to politics.” Toffler said people would be “moving more, throwing away their belongings sooner and having to adapt more often to new kinds of work” (Toffler 1970).

These ideas would sound familiar to American educators; they now live in the world Toffler predicted over four decades ago. Consider these facts:

·       Knowledge is doubling every 12 months; an IBM study in 2012 predicted it will one day be doubling every 12 hours.

·       Data is coming at schools in bigger batches, so much that it’s overwhelming.

·       Technology continues to evolve and deepen its ability to affect change around the world.

·       American society continues to redefine what is to be accepted, or not accepted, in American schools.

·       The evolving global economy requires educators to prepare students for a world that doesn’t exist yet.

As I speak with educators from around America, I hear of the stress they endure on a daily basis. They want to produce 21st century results; yet, they are working in a 20th century model. The demands of the past, the accelerated disruptions of the present, and the need to shift to the future are overloading their ability to process information and to transform their schools. Their tasks are so varied and the landscape has become so complex that they often wonder where to start and how to arrange the steps. American educators are experiencing the stress Toffler predicted 46 years ago—they are living in a state of future shock.

To function more effectively in today’s fast-forward world, educators need to remember one of Toffler’s most famous quotes:

            The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.

In education, the days of mastery are over; the new key to success is adaptation. Educators must be comfortable with not always knowing the next step—they must be willing to try new methods and constantly adapt to a disrupted environment. In other words, they must be comfortable with being uncomfortable. Educators can begin by asking some difficult questions, such as:

·       How much memorization is needed in a time when the key to success is applying knowledge that is easily available through cloud sources?

·       What are the roles of textbooks in schools when knowledge doubles yearly and will soon be doubling every 12 hours?

·       How can educators teach today’s group of students, Gen Z?

·       What does learning space look like in a 21st century school?

Ultimately, true success in an era of future shock does not revolve around test scores or accountability ratings— educators must answer the essential question of their careers: What does it mean to be educated in the 21st century?

If Toffler were helping educators find answers today, he would tell them to view education through a 21st century lens, not one left over from the previous century.  They must shift their thinking, implement global skills, allow their students to use technology, and design their learning spaces to fit the needs of Gen Z. Educators must spend the rest of their careers learning, unlearning, and relearning—this is the way out of future shock.